« Vegetable of the Week - Scorzonera | Main | Vegetables of the Week - Celeriac and Swede »

What Cheeses Me Off!

Just recently I stumbled upon the health section of a newspaper called The Epoch Times. I’m not sure who the readership of this newspaper is but I’m guessing it’s American, Australian, southern hemisphere travellers.

To see red would be an understatement of the highest order. The thing that sparked my anger? An article on nutrition with the caption ‘Myths and truths about nutrition’. As the caption suggests, there was a paragraph about something the writer considered to be a myth, followed by an explanation. All the ‘myths’ were about saturated fat. Indeed the feature read as though it was written by the saturated fat appreciation society.

The problem with this article is that the ‘truths’ were only half truths (if that) and completely misleading. To make the ‘truths’ appear conclusive; a supporting reference was given. This in itself was alarming since some of the references were 40 years old, which also brings into question the validity of these studies. I’d like to see the criteria for these studies - the sample size, selection of subjects, ethnicity etc. etc. This feature did not use any recent studies to support its claims.

Rather than accepting this feature as simply bad journalism I started to think about who had written such a piece. It was authored by The Weston A. Price Foundation. Who are they you might wonder. I’ll tell you. They are a non-profit organisation who believe the answer to human health is to consume whole foods (granted, a good thing) and activators found exclusively in animal fats.

This type of diet has similarities to the paleolithic diet otherwise known as the caveman diet, of which I’m a great advocate. The feature did not explain that paleolithic man is considered somewhat healthier than we are today because they had to hunt their food and therefore expended many more calories per day in so doing. The feature simply had a picture of deep fat fried fish and chips under the caption ‘myths and truths about nutrition’.

The Weston A. Price Foundation has the right to believe what it will. Indeed a quick glance at their website will provide some interesting reading. To imply that saturated fat is not a risk factor for heart disease and that vegetarianism is not healthy is another matter.

Comments (1)

Jordan:

Hi Cally

I've been doing a google search on the Weston A Price Foundation (WAPF) to find articles/sites that oppose the foundation's views. Obviously it's not hard to find objection to their ideas, but I am particularly interested in instances of direct and qualified objection to their ideas. So far I've found a few random blog entries voicing their disapproval, and a couple of more serious objections coming from quackwatch.org and from Dr Campbell, the author of The China Study. Both of these have emphasised that most of the WAPF members are not science trained, and that the WAPF has strong links to the American farming community. Probably the most controversial of the claims made by the WAPF is that saturated fat and cholesterol have been incorrectly linked to heart disease. Another group, The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics (www.THINCS.org), share this philosophy. I am interested to know if you have come across any commentaries in the nutrition world that directly address THINCS' position on this matter. Unlike the WAPF, THINCS has 77 members qualified in medicine and science, including 23 PhDs in the medical field, from all around the world. I was hoping that since the objections levelled against the WAPF cannot so easily be applied to THINCS, there may be some commentary out there that takes THINCS on directly - thus far I haven't found anything.

So that you know, I got interested in nutrition a couple of years back when I met my ex. She has for some years been following a nutritional program run by a doctor in Queenland Australia, inspired by WAPF principles, to help her recover from chronic fatigue. Due to her success with the program and the research put into it by her ex (who is a nutritionist), I have for some time been quite partial to WAPF ideas. I'm starting to take a more critical look at the issue now, so any thoughts you can add to the debate that's going on in my head would be most welcome!

I would have emailed you but I can't seem to find a link to your email address anywhere on the site. Hence, this message is not intended as a "comment" so you don't need to add it as one.

Thanks for your help!
Jordan

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 26, 2006 6:35 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Vegetable of the Week - Scorzonera.

The next post in this blog is Vegetables of the Week - Celeriac and Swede.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.34